PROPOSED SCORE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF AN ENDOSCOPY DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING

Authors

  • Ioan Sporea
  • Alina Popescu
  • Roxana Sirli
  • Oliviu Pascu
  • Cristina Cijevschi Prelipcean
  • Daniela Dobru
  • Simona Bota
  • Diana Gherhardt
  • Oana Gradinaru
  • Madalina Popescu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-730

Keywords:

screening colonoscopy, quality assurance, performance, self-assessment

Abstract

The aim of the paper was to propose a score for performance evaluation in colonoscopy units.

Method. We proposed a score (CDCD score - Cecal intubation, polyp Detection rate, Cleansing and Documentation of cecal intubation) based on the following parameters that  assess the quality of colonoscopy units: total colonoscopies rate, polyp detection rate, rate of cecal intubation photo record, rate of recorded Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) (rated 1 to 5 stars). The mean score obtained based on the above mentioned criteria was used as a quality parameter of the endoscopy unit.

We  applied and calculated this score in all screening colonoscopies performed in our Endoscopy Department during the last 4 years.

Results. The study group included 856 screening colonoscopies. The rate of total colonoscopies was 92.1% (789/856 cases) and the polyp detection rate was 23.9%. Regarding the quality of bowel preparation, the BBPS was recorded in 51.1% cases. The cecal intubation was photo recorded in 44% of cases.

We considered that of the 4 parameters, the highest weight for an excellent quality belonged to the cecal intubation rate, followed by the polyp detection rate, because they evaluate the endoscopic technique, while the other 2 are more administrative. Thus, for the unit’s assessment we used the following equation: UNIT’S QUALITY CDCD SCORE = (3xcecal intubation rate+3xpolyp detection rate+1xphoto documentation+1xBBPS documentation)/8. Thus, the CDCD Score for our unit was ≈4 stars (3.7 stars).

Conclusion. the proposed CDCD score may be an objective tool for the quality assessment in different endoscopy units.


 

Author Biographies

Ioan Sporea, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Alina Popescu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Roxana Sirli, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Oliviu Pascu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy “Iuliu Haţieganu” Cluj Napoca

Regional Institute of Gastroenterology

Cristina Cijevschi Prelipcean, University of Medicine Iaşi

Department of Gastroenterology

Daniela Dobru, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Tirgu Mureș

Department of Gastroenterology

Simona Bota, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timișoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Diana Gherhardt, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Oana Gradinaru, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Madalina Popescu, University of Medicine and Pharmacy "Victor Babes" Timisoara

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Downloads

Published

2016-12-07

How to Cite

1.
Sporea I, Popescu A, Sirli R, Pascu O, Cijevschi Prelipcean C, Dobru D, Bota S, Gherhardt D, Gradinaru O, Popescu M. PROPOSED SCORE FOR THE SELF-ASSESSMENT OF AN ENDOSCOPY DEPARTMENT PERFORMANCE IN COLONOSCOPY SCREENING. Med Pharm Rep [Internet]. 2016 Dec. 7 [cited 2025 Oct. 5];90(1):28-32. Available from: https://medpharmareports.com/index.php/mpr/article/view/730

Issue

Section

Original Research